Editorial Article Open Access Transmucosal Delivery & Dosage Form Engineering

Physicochemical Challenges in Alcohol-Free Sublingual Sprays: Solutions for Enhanced Stability and Bioavailability

Published: 9 May 2026 · Olympia R&D Bulletin · Permalink: olympiabiosciences.com/rd-hub/alcohol-free-sublingual-formulation-stability/ · 8 sources cited · ≈ 10 min read
Physicochemical Challenges in Alcohol-Free Sublingual Sprays: Solutions for Enhanced Stability and Bioavailability — Transmucosal Delivery & Dosage Form Engineering scientific visualization

Industry Challenge

Formulating stable alcohol-free sublingual sprays presents significant challenges, particularly for complex blends of amino acids and lipophilic botanicals, due to issues like crystallisation, phase separation, and subsequent nozzle obstruction.

Olympia AI-Verified Solution

Olympia Biosciences™ employs advanced physicochemical engineering to overcome these stability failures, enabling robust alcohol-free sublingual delivery platforms that ensure consistent performance and bioavailability.

💬 Not a scientist? 💬 Get a plain-English summary

In Plain English

Many people want sprays that deliver health benefits quickly by being absorbed under the tongue, especially without alcohol. However, removing alcohol makes it difficult to keep ingredients, like protein building blocks and oily plant extracts, well mixed. Without alcohol to keep them stable, these ingredients can form crystals or separate, which often leads to clogged spray nozzles. Scientists are therefore developing clever new ways to design these alcohol-free sprays so they remain perfectly clear and effective.

Olympia already has a formulation or technology that directly addresses this research area.

Talk to us →

Abstract

Sublingual sprays occupy a commercially attractive space in nutraceutical and pharmaceutical delivery: they bypass hepatic first-pass metabolism, exploit the highly vascularised sublingual mucosa, and offer needle-free rapid absorption. The conventional solution to formulating complex botanical and amino acid blends has been to include ethanol at concentrations of 15–40%, where it acts simultaneously as solvent, wetting agent, and antimicrobial preservative. As consumer demand, regulatory guidance, and paediatric or alcohol-sensitive indications push formulators toward alcohol-free aqueous platforms, a cascade of stability failures emerges. This article examines those failure modes in physicochemical depth — crystallisation of amino acids, phase separation of lipophilic botanical fractions, and nozzle obstruction — and then surveys the engineered architectures that can circumvent them.

1. The Appeal and the Problem

Sublingually delivered liquids reach systemic circulation within minutes. The sublingual mucosa presents a non-keratinised epithelium with a mean thickness of only 100–200 µm and dense capillary perfusion, making it among the most permeable mucosal surfaces accessible without invasive devices. [^1] In a simple ethanolic solution, lipophilic botanical actives and polar amino acids alike remain solubilised: ethanol disrupts the hydrogen-bonding network of water, depresses the dielectric constant of the medium, and creates a miscible organic continuum in which both hydrophilic and hydrophobic solutes can coexist. Remove the ethanol and replace it with water, glycerin, or aqueous glycerin blends, and thermodynamic reality reasserts itself with considerable force.

Three principal failure mechanisms dominate in practice:

  1. Crystallisation and salting-out of amino acids at high concentrations or low temperatures
  2. Phase separation and agglomeration of lipophilic botanical fractions
  3. Nozzle clogging as the downstream mechanical consequence of both

Each has a distinct physicochemical origin and demands a tailored engineering response.

2. Amino Acid Crystallisation in Aqueous Solutions

2.1 Solubility Thermodynamics

Amino acids dissolved at the concentrations typical of functional nutraceutical sprays — taurine at 50–200 mM, glycine at 100–500 mM, L-theanine at 10–50 mM — exist as supersaturated or near-saturated solutions in water, particularly when chilled during storage or shipment. Their crystallisation behaviour is far from simple.

Glycine, the most extensively characterised example, exists in three polymorphic forms (α, β, γ). Recent nucleation studies demonstrate that polymorph outcome is exquisitely sensitive to environmental conditions. Cotting et al. showed in 2025 that sodium chloride — a near-universal excipient in liquid formulations — stabilises the metastable β-glycine polymorph for hours and dramatically alters the classical nucleation pathway: γ-glycine ultimately nucleates on the surface of β-glycine crystals rather than directly from solution, a mechanism that runs counter to the previously accepted model. [^5] Wang and Tiwary independently confirmed in 2025 that elevated ionic strength generically enhances polymorph metastability, accelerating nucleation of thermodynamically disfavoured forms. From a formulation standpoint, this matters enormously: a spray containing even physiologically relevant electrolyte levels can initiate an unanticipated crystallisation pathway, producing crystals with a different shape, density, and dissolution rate than the formulator anticipated.

For taurine, recent crystallisation studies reveal that process conditions determine crystal morphology with precision. Wu et al. demonstrated in 2020 that sodium sulfate (a common ionic excipient) modifies taurine crystal morphology from needle-shaped to columnar by selectively adsorbing on the (011) and (11-1) crystal faces and inhibiting their growth. Needle-shaped taurine crystals are particularly hazardous from a device standpoint: they interlock upon settling and form dense, intractable plugs. A 2025 study using differential scanning calorimetry to map taurine crystal defects found that gradient cooling from 80°C to 15°C substantially changes internal defect structure, with larger crystals containing approximately 15.6 times more internal moisture than smaller equivalents — defects that release water upon storage, locally increasing solute concentration and triggering secondary nucleation events.

2.2 Salting-Out Interactions

The simultaneous presence of multiple amino acids and ionic excipients creates competition for the water of solvation. Naderi et al., studying aqueous ternary systems of amino acids and quaternary ammonium salts, found systematic salting-out behaviour driven by unfavourable solute–solute interactions, with the strength of the effect following the order serine > glycine > alanine > proline. [^2] In a spray formulation containing taurine, glycine, and L-theanine together with potassium sorbate or sodium benzoate as preservatives, the ionic environment generated by the preservative salt can cross the threshold that initiates salting-out of the amino acids — even when each individual component remains below its nominal saturation concentration in pure water.

Guin et al. further demonstrated concentration- and temperature-dependent switching between salting-in and salting-out for alanine and threonine in ammonium sulphate media, with salting-out dominating at higher electrolyte concentrations. This behaviour implies that cooling a correctly formulated spray (which may be salted-in at room temperature) can shift the equilibrium to the salting-out regime, initiating crystallisation during cold-chain storage or in an unheated warehouse in winter.

2.3 The Role of Mechanical Agitation

Vesga et al. established that stirring promotes the metastable α-polymorph of glycine, while γ-glycine (the stable form) nucleates preferentially under quiescent conditions. [^4] A sublingual spray bottle undergoes repeated mechanical agitation during transport and use. Each actuation generates shear through the pump mechanism, and this repeated perturbation may selectively promote metastable polymorph nucleation — forms that subsequently transform to more stable, less soluble polymorphs upon rest, producing a progressively worsening precipitation problem over the product's shelf life.

3. Botanical Extract Phase Separation in Aqueous Matrices

3.1 The Compositional Complexity Problem

Botanical extracts are not single-compound entities. A liquid extract of valerian, ashwagandha, passionflower, or Centella asiatica contains simultaneously: flavonoids and other polar polyphenols (log P typically −1 to +2), condensed tannins (high molecular weight, amphiphilic), resinous terpenoid fractions (log P +3 to +6), and trace essential oil components (log P +4 to +8). These coexist in ethanolic solution because ethanol expands the miscibility window. In an aqueous-glycerin matrix, the system is thermodynamically unstable with respect to the lipophilic fractions.

Sepperer and Tondi's fractionation work on industrial tannin extracts demonstrated that industrial tannin powders contain 20–25% hydrocolloids alongside their polyphenolic content, and that selective solubility behaviour differs sharply between these fractions depending on solvent polarity. [^6] When transferred to a predominantly aqueous medium, the hydrophobic tannin oligomers and resins — which readily dissolved in the acetone/ethanol extraction medium — aggregate via hydrophobic stacking interactions and eventually phase-separate.

3.2 Mechanisms of Destabilisation

  • Ostwald ripening of fine droplets formed upon dilution from an ethanolic concentrate: small lipophilic droplets dissolve preferentially and redeposit on larger ones, driving progressive coarsening until macroscopic phase separation occurs.
  • Tannin–protein interactions, when protein-based excipients (gelatine, casein hydrolysates) are present, produce precipitates at low ionic strength that can occlude pump channels.
  • Essential oil component autoxidation: monoterpene alcohols and sesquiterpenes undergo autoxidative polymerisation in the absence of the antioxidant environment provided by ethanolic solutions, producing resinous precipitates.

Ueoka and Moraes found that liquid crystal formation in emulsified botanical formulations using cetearyl alcohol significantly enhanced stability, and that formulations containing glycolic extracts from Centella asiatica and Hamamelis virginiana remained homogeneous over 90 days under thermal cycling only when a structured liquid-crystal phase was deliberately induced. Absent such structuring, botanical-containing emulsions showed progressive phase separation driven by extract-induced disruption of the emulsifier film.

4. Nozzle Clogging: The Engineering Consequence

4.1 Mechanisms of Obstruction

Nozzle clogging in sublingual and nasal spray devices occurs through two principal routes that often operate in concert:

  • Evaporative crystallisation at the nozzle tip: between actuations, the small liquid volume retained in the nozzle orifice (typically 2–10 µL) loses water to evaporation. As the water activity drops, supersaturation is quickly achieved for any solute present above 50 mM. Taurine and glycine, at typical nutraceutical spray concentrations of 100–300 mM, will crystallise at the nozzle tip within hours of last use, forming a microcrystalline seal that must be mechanically disrupted by the next actuation. Repeated crystallisation–dissolution cycles damage the orifice geometry, enlarging the orifice irregularly and changing spray angle and droplet size distribution.
  • Particle agglomeration in the delivery channel: botanical resin droplets and tannin aggregates in the sub-micron to micron size range undergo Brownian collision and progressive aggregation. Unlike reversible flocculation, resin-mediated aggregation is often irreversible — the viscoelastic resin film at the droplet surface confers an energy barrier against redispersion. This aggregated material accumulates at the valve seat and the nozzle insert, the points of maximum local pressure differential and minimum internal diameter.

Device studies confirm how sensitive spray performance is to even modest changes in nozzle geometry. Tong et al. showed that 10 µm particles are optimal for sublingual/nasal delivery, and that the spray cone angle and nozzle insertion depth together determine deposition with high sensitivity.[^8] A partially obstructed nozzle that increases effective orifice diameter by even 20% dramatically shifts the droplet size distribution upward, moving particles out of the optimal deposition range and reducing mucosal contact.

Seifelnasr et al. found that the nozzle retraction distance during actuation — nominally around 5.5 mm in standard multi-dose pumps — is a critical determinant of initial deposition pattern and drug loss to the pharynx.[^7] Partial obstruction changes the effective retraction dynamics, further compromising reproducibility.

4.2 Detection and Prediction

Nozzle clogging in alcohol-free formulations is notoriously difficult to predict from accelerated stability data alone, because the evaporative concentrating mechanism operates primarily at ambient humidity and room temperature — conditions that accelerated stability protocols at 40°C/75% RH do not replicate faithfully. The most predictive test is a repeated use/rest cycling study at the anticipated worst-case in-use temperature and humidity.

5. Engineering Solutions: Advanced Solubilisation Architectures

The engineering response to these failure modes has converged on four principal technology platforms, each addressing a distinct thermodynamic root cause.

5.1 Nanoemulsions

Oil-in-water nanoemulsions with droplet radii below 100 nm represent the most direct solution to the phase separation problem for lipophilic botanical fractions. At this scale, the kinetics of Ostwald ripening slow dramatically (ripening rate scales with droplet radius cubed), and the formulation remains optically transparent — a significant consumer acceptance advantage for sublingual sprays.

Choi and McClements' comprehensive review of nanoemulsion delivery systems for nutraceuticals identifies the key design parameters: lipid phase composition, emulsifier type and concentration, and processing energy input. For botanical extracts, medium-chain triglycerides (MCT) are preferred as the lipid phase because they solubilise a broad range of terpenoid and phenolic lipophilics and are generally recognised as safe for oral mucosal application. Polysorbate 80 and lecithin are the most commonly employed emulsifiers; at concentrations above the critical micelle concentration but below levels that cause mucosal irritation, they form stable interfacial films that resist coalescence.

Aboalnaja et al. characterised the two strategic uses of nanoemulsions in delivery: as a delivery vehicle (nanoemulsion delivery systems, NDS, where the bioactive is dissolved in the lipid phase) and as an excipient system (NES, co-administered with the primary product to improve bioaccessibility). For sublingual sprays, the NDS architecture is most relevant: it simultaneously solubilises the lipophilic fractions and presents them at the mucosa as nanoscale lipid droplets that merge readily with the mucosal lipid film.

5.2 Polymeric Micelles and Self-Micellising Systems

Polymeric micelles formed from amphiphilic block copolymers (poloxamers, PEG-phospholipid conjugates) or natural amphiphiles (saponins, glycyrrhizin) provide a thermodynamically stable solubilisation environment for molecules of intermediate log P. Their critical micelle concentration is typically orders of magnitude lower than that of small-molecule surfactants, meaning micellar solubilisation is maintained even after the significant dilution that occurs when a sublingual spray contacts the pool of saliva under the tongue.

Nanomicelle delivery for nutraceuticals has shown particular promise for curcumin, coenzyme Q10, and lipophilic vitamins — all of which share log P and molecular weight characteristics similar to terpenoid botanical actives. The additional advantage of polymeric micelles for spray applications is that their core is essentially anhydrous, meaning lipophilic actives loaded within the core do not interact with water molecules and are protected from hydrolytic degradation — a failure mode for some terpene esters and resinous glycosides.

5.3 Cyclodextrin Inclusion Complexation

For compounds of defined molecular geometry — many flavonoids, individual terpenoids, and some amino acid derivatives — cyclodextrin inclusion complexation provides precision solubilisation through host–guest chemistry. β-Cyclodextrin and its hydroxypropyl derivative (HPβCD) are the most widely used, offering cavity dimensions suited to molecules of molecular weight 200–500 Da.

Singh and colleagues' broad review of phytochemical–cyclodextrin complexes documents solubility improvements of 5- to 50-fold for compounds ranging from curcumin and quercetin to artemisinins and dihydromyricetin. The complexation simultaneously addresses solubility, chemical stability (the host cavity shields the guest from oxidation and hydrolysis), and taste masking — relevant for sublingual formulations where the drug is in prolonged contact with taste receptors.

The recent patent review by Costa et al. on propolis–cyclodextrin systems highlights how this approach can be extended to complex botanical resin matrices: propolis, whose activity derives from a broad spectrum of lipophilic flavonoids and terpenoids, becomes both water-soluble and shelf-stable upon HPβCD complexation, with demonstrated applications in sublingual and buccal pharmaceutical products. Critically for the alcohol-free challenge, CD complexation replaces the solvating function of ethanol with a supramolecular mechanism that does not require organic solvents.

5.4 Nanostructured Lipid Carriers and Solid Lipid Nanoparticles

Nanostructured lipid carriers (NLC) combine a solid lipid matrix with a liquid lipid internal phase, creating an imperfect crystal lattice that can accommodate a higher drug load than pure solid lipid nanoparticles (SLN) with reduced expulsion upon storage. For sublingual delivery, particles in the 50–200 nm range produced by high-shear homogenisation or ultrasonication provide the necessary fineness to pass through the pump orifice without obstruction. Suryawijaya et al.'s NLC work with green tea extract found that a 50:50 solid/liquid lipid ratio gave the best stability and smallest particle size (approximately 360 nm), while higher solid lipid ratios drove phase separation upon thermal cycling — a clear design constraint for alcohol-free botanical spray formulations.

5.5 Two-Component Device Architectures

When physicochemical engineering of the liquid phase alone cannot achieve the required stability, device engineering offers a parallel solution. Rautiola and Siegel demonstrated a pneumatic nasal spray device capable of mixing a solid and liquid component during actuation, thereby keeping the drug in its most stable (solid or lyophilised) state until the moment of delivery. This approach is conceptually applicable to sublingual sprays: amino acids stored as a dry powder and botanical nanoemulsion stored as a separate liquid are mixed only at the point of actuation, eliminating the stability challenge entirely at the cost of device complexity.

Author Contributions

O.B.: Conceptualization, Literature Review, Writing — Original Draft, Writing — Review & Editing. The author has read and approved the published version of the manuscript.

Conflict of Interest

Competing interests: none declared. This article synthesises findings from a literature search conducted May 2026 and is intended as a technical overview, not a systematic review.

Olimpia Baranowska

Olimpia Baranowska

CEO & Scientific Director · M.Sc. Eng. Applied Physics & Applied Mathematics (Abstract Quantum Physics & Organic Microelectronics) · Ph.D. Candidate in Medical Sciences (Phlebology)

Founder of Olympia Biosciences™ (IOC Ltd.) · ISO 27001 Lead Auditor · Specialising in pharmaceutical-grade CDMO formulation, liposomal & nanoparticle delivery systems, and clinical nutrition.

Proprietary IP

Interested in This Technology?

Interested in building a product around this science? We work with pharmaceutical companies, longevity clinics, and PE-backed brands to translate proprietary R&D into market-ready formulations.

Selected technologies may be offered exclusively to one strategic partner per category — initiate due diligence to confirm allocation status.

Discuss a Partnership →

References

8 sources cited

  1. 1.
    Nasal and sublingual spray delivery devices : Market opportunities and unmet medical needs, 2016.
  2. 2.
    Naderi et al., 2023. Vapor–Liquid Equilibrium Study on Amino Acid + Quaternary Ammonium Salt Aqueous Ternary Systems. Journal of Chemical & Engineering Data.
  3. 3.
    Hu et al., 2016. Nucleation of amino acid-rich crystals on the surface of dried scallop (Chlamys farreri) during storage: formation mechanism and influence of environmental relative humidity. International Journal of Food Science and Technology.
  4. 4.
    Vesga et al., 2019. Conundrum of γ glycine nucleation revisited: to stir or not to stir?. CrysteEngComm.
  5. 5.
    Cotting et al., 2025. The effect of salt additives on the glycine crystallization pathway revealed by studying one crystal nucleation at a time. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
  6. 6.
    Sepperer & Tondi, 2018. Fractioning of Industrial Tannin Extract in Different Organic Solvents.
  7. 7.
    Seifelnasr et al., 2024. Effects of Nozzle Retraction Elimination on Spray Distribution in Middle-Posterior Turbinate Regions: A Comparative Study. Pharmaceutics.
  8. 8.
    Tong et al., 2016. Effects of nasal drug delivery device and its orientation on sprayed particle deposition in a realistic human nasal cavity. Comput. Biol. Medicine.

Global Scientific & Legal Disclaimer

  1. 1. B2B & Educational Purposes Only. The scientific literature, research insights, and educational materials published on the Olympia Biosciences website are provided strictly for informational, academic, and Business-to-Business (B2B) industry reference. They are intended solely for medical professionals, pharmacologists, biotechnologists, and brand developers operating in a professional B2B capacity.

  2. 2. No Product-Specific Claims.. Olympia Biosciences™ operates exclusively as a B2B contract manufacturer. The research, ingredient profiles, and physiological mechanisms discussed herein are general academic overviews. They do not refer to, endorse, or constitute authorized marketing health claims for any specific commercial dietary supplement, medical food, or end-product manufactured in our facilities. Nothing on this page constitutes a health claim within the meaning of Regulation (EC) No 1924/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council.

  3. 3. Not Medical Advice.. The content provided does not constitute medical advice, diagnosis, treatment, or clinical recommendations. It is not intended to replace consultation with a qualified healthcare provider. All published scientific material represents general academic overviews based on peer-reviewed research and should be interpreted exclusively in a B2B formulation and R&D context.

  4. 4. Regulatory Status & Client Responsibility.. While we respect and operate within the guidelines of global health authorities (including EFSA, FDA, and EMA), the emerging scientific research discussed in our articles may not have been formally evaluated by these agencies. Final product regulatory compliance, label accuracy, and substantiation of B2C marketing claims in any jurisdiction remain the sole legal responsibility of the brand owner. Olympia Biosciences™ provides manufacturing, formulation, and analytical services only. These statements and raw data have not been evaluated by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA), or the Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA). The raw active pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs) and formulations discussed are not intended to diagnose, treat, cure, or prevent any disease. Nothing on this page constitutes a health claim within the meaning of EU Regulation (EC) No 1924/2006 or the U.S. Dietary Supplement Health and Education Act (DSHEA).

Our IP Pledge

We do not own consumer brands. We never compete with our clients.

Every formula engineered at Olympia Biosciences™ is built from scratch and transferred to you with full intellectual property ownership. Zero conflict of interest — guaranteed by ISO 27001 cybersecurity and ironclad NDAs.

Explore IP Protection

Cite

APA

Baranowska, O. (2026). Physicochemical Challenges in Alcohol-Free Sublingual Sprays: Solutions for Enhanced Stability and Bioavailability. Olympia R&D Bulletin. https://olympiabiosciences.com/rd-hub/alcohol-free-sublingual-formulation-stability/

Vancouver

Baranowska O. Physicochemical Challenges in Alcohol-Free Sublingual Sprays: Solutions for Enhanced Stability and Bioavailability. Olympia R&D Bulletin. 2026. Available from: https://olympiabiosciences.com/rd-hub/alcohol-free-sublingual-formulation-stability/

BibTeX
@article{Baranowska2026alcoholf,
  author  = {Baranowska, Olimpia},
  title   = {Physicochemical Challenges in Alcohol-Free Sublingual Sprays: Solutions for Enhanced Stability and Bioavailability},
  journal = {Olympia R\&D Bulletin},
  year    = {2026},
  url     = {https://olympiabiosciences.com/rd-hub/alcohol-free-sublingual-formulation-stability/}
}

Executive protocol review

Article

Physicochemical Challenges in Alcohol-Free Sublingual Sprays: Solutions for Enhanced Stability and Bioavailability

https://olympiabiosciences.com/rd-hub/alcohol-free-sublingual-formulation-stability/

1

Send Olimpia a note first

Let Olimpia know which article you'd like to discuss before booking your slot.

2

OPEN EXECUTIVE ALLOCATION CALENDAR

Select a qualification slot after submitting mandate context to prioritize strategic fit.

OPEN EXECUTIVE ALLOCATION CALENDAR

Express Interest in This Technology

We'll follow up with licensing or partnership details.

Article

Physicochemical Challenges in Alcohol-Free Sublingual Sprays: Solutions for Enhanced Stability and Bioavailability

No spam. Olimpia will review your signal personally.